more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 3136

[filed under theme 15. Nature of Minds / A. Nature of Mind / 1. Mind / e. Questions about mind ]

Full Idea

There are three main views regarding the ontology of mental phenomena: reductionism, dualism and eliminativism.

Clarification

Thoughts are explained as something else, or exist independently, or are non-existent

Gist of Idea

The three theories are reduction, dualism, eliminativism

Source

Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 1.1)

Book Ref

Rey,Georges: 'Contemporary Philosophy of Mind' [Blackwell 1997], p.14


A Reaction

It is precisely this picture which is rejected by Davidson and co, who want something called 'property dualism', with a unique relationship which is labelled 'supervenient'. Unfortunately there is no analogy for it. Not even beauty and a statue.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [questions to be decided about the mind]:

Is the function of the mind management, authority and planning - or is it one's whole way of life? [Plato]
Minds are hard-wired, or trial-and-error, or experimental, or full self-aware [Dennett, by Heil]
I say psychology is intentional, semantics is informational, and thinking is computation [Fodor]
In CRTT thought may be represented, content must be [Fodor]
The only serious mind-brain theories now are identity, token identity, realization and supervenience [Papineau]
The three theories are reduction, dualism, eliminativism [Rey]
Different generations focus on either the quality of mind, or its scientific standing, or the content of thought [Heil]
Types are properties, and tokens are events. Are they split between mental and physical, or not? [Sturgeon]
Mindless bodies are zombies, bodiless minds are ghosts [Sturgeon]
The main questions are: is mind distinct from body, and does it have unique properties? [Lowe]