more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 3169

[filed under theme 19. Language / F. Communication / 5. Pragmatics / b. Implicature ]

Full Idea

Bifurcated logical particles (either/or, if/then) are in principle beyond the power of any local chaining device to build sentences.

Gist of Idea

A simple chaining device can't build sentences containing 'either..or', or 'if..then'

Source

Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 4.2.1)

Book Ref

Rey,Georges: 'Contemporary Philosophy of Mind' [Blackwell 1997], p.110


A Reaction

True in natural languages, but not in formal ones? If P then either if-Q-then-R or if-S-then-T. Is that chaining? If rain, then if light then puddles, or if heavy then floods. Hm.


The 11 ideas with the same theme [unspoken rules of normal conversation]:

The pragmatics of language is more comprehensible than the meaning [Nietzsche]
Grice's maxim of quantity says be sufficiently informative [Grice, by Magidor]
Grice's maxim of quality says do not assert what you believe to be false [Grice, by Magidor]
Grice's maxim of manner requires one to be as brief as possible [Grice, by Magidor]
Key conversational maxims are 'quality' (assert truth) and 'quantity' (leave nothing out) [Grice, by Read]
We use expressions 'deferentially', to conform to the use of other people [Evans]
An assertion is an attempt to rule out certain possibilities, narrowing things down for good planning [Stalnaker, by Schroeter]
A simple chaining device can't build sentences containing 'either..or', or 'if..then' [Rey]
'Background deletion' is appropriately omitting background from an answer [Hofweber]
The infelicitiousness of trivial falsity is explained by expectations, or the loss of a context-set [Magidor]
The infelicitiousness of trivial truth is explained by uninformativeness, or a static context-set [Magidor]