more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 3329
[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / G. Scientific Philosophy / 1. Aims of Science
]
Full Idea
As our bible, the Book of Science is presumed to contain only true sentences, but it is less clear how they are to be construed, which literally and which non-literally.
Gist of Idea
Presumably the statements of science are true, but should they be taken literally or not?
Source
José A. Benardete (Metaphysics: the logical approach [1989], Ch.13)
Book Ref
Benardete,José A.: 'Metaphysics: The Logical Approach' [OUP 1989], p.94
The
12 ideas
with the same theme
[knowledge gained by experiments]:
|
76
|
The object of scientific knowledge is what is necessary
[Aristotle]
|
|
2200
|
All experimental conclusions assume that the future will be like the past
[Hume]
|
|
6782
|
Realism is the only philosophy of science that doesn't make the success of science a miracle
[Putnam]
|
|
6601
|
Science rules the globe because of colonising power, not inherent rationality
[Feyerabend]
|
|
3853
|
For science to be rational, we must explain scientific change rationally
[Newton-Smith]
|
|
3859
|
We do not wish merely to predict, we also want to explain
[Newton-Smith]
|
|
3870
|
The real problem of science is how to choose between possible explanations
[Newton-Smith]
|
|
3329
|
Presumably the statements of science are true, but should they be taken literally or not?
[Benardete,JA]
|
|
5334
|
We resist science partly because it can't provide ethical wisdom
[Flanagan]
|
|
4588
|
There is no such thing as 'science'; there are just many different sciences
[Heil]
|
|
3123
|
Science is in the business of carving nature at the joints
[Segal]
|
|
6779
|
Instrumentalists say distinctions between observation and theory vanish with ostensive definition
[Bird]
|