more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 3366

[filed under theme 15. Nature of Minds / B. Features of Minds / 5. Qualia / b. Qualia and intentionality ]

Full Idea

Some mental phenomena - in particular, sensations like tickles and pains - do not seem to exhibit either reference or content.

Gist of Idea

Pain has no reference or content

Source

Jaegwon Kim (Philosophy of Mind [1996], p. 21)

Book Ref

Kim,Jaegwon: 'Philosophy of Mind' [Westview 1998], p.21


A Reaction

This could be challenged. These sensations cannot be had without a bodily location, and they give information about possible contact or damage.

Related Idea

Idea 4089 Pains have a region of the body as their intentional content, not some pain object [Crane]


The 12 ideas with the same theme [how qualia relate to thoughts being about things]:

Mental unity suggests that qualia and intentionality must connect [Brentano, by Rey]
The qualities involved in sensations are entirely intentional [Anscombe, by Armstrong]
The Twin Earth theory suggests that intentionality is independent of qualia [Jacquette on Putnam]
Pain is not intentional, because it does not represent anything beyond itself [Searle]
Qualities of experience are just representational aspects of experience ('Representationalism') [Harman, by Burge]
Pain has no reference or content [Kim]
The Inverted Earth example shows that phenomenal properties are not representational [Block, by Rowlands]
If qualia have no function, their attachment to thoughts is accidental [Rey]
Are qualia a type of propositional attitude? [Rey]
Pains have a region of the body as their intentional content, not some pain object [Crane]
Intentionality isn't reducible, because of its experiential aspect [Sturgeon]
Maybe lots of qualia lead to intentionality, rather than intentionality being basic [Gildersleve]