more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 3439

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / D. Property Dualism / 1. Reductionism critique ]

Full Idea

The main obstacle to mind-body reduction is qualia.

Gist of Idea

Reductionism gets stuck with qualia

Source

Jaegwon Kim (Philosophy of Mind [1996], p.236)

Book Ref

Kim,Jaegwon: 'Philosophy of Mind' [Westview 1998], p.236


A Reaction

Personally I am also impressed by Leibniz's Mill (Idea 2109). No microscope could ever reveal the contents of thought. How can it be so vivid for the owner, but totally undetectable to an observer?

Related Idea

Idea 2109 Increase a conscious machine to the size of a mill - you still won't see perceptions in it [Leibniz]


The 10 ideas with the same theme [arguments against reducing mind to brain]:

Reduction is impossible because mind is holistic and brain isn't [Davidson, by Maslin]
If the mind is an anomaly, this makes reduction of the mental to the physical impossible [Davidson]
Consciousness has a first-person ontology, so it cannot be reduced without omitting something [Searle]
Maybe intentionality is reducible, but qualia aren't [Kim]
Reductionism is impossible if there aren't any 'bridge laws' between mental and physical [Kim]
Reductionism gets stuck with qualia [Kim]
The problems of misrepresentation and error have dogged physicalist reductions of intentionality [Crane]
Higher-level sciences cannot be reduced, because their concepts mark boundaries invisible at lower levels [Heil]
Higher-level sciences designate real properties of objects, which are not reducible to lower levels [Heil]
Rule-following can't be reduced to the physical [Sturgeon]