more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 3440

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 5. Causal Argument ]

Full Idea

If reductionism goes, so does the intelligibility of mental causation.

Gist of Idea

Without reductionism, mental causation is baffling

Source

Jaegwon Kim (Philosophy of Mind [1996], p.237)

Book Ref

Kim,Jaegwon: 'Philosophy of Mind' [Westview 1998], p.237


A Reaction

Quite so. Substance dualism turns mental causation into a miracle, but property dualism is really no better. If no laws connect brain and mind, you have no account. I don't see how 'reasons are causes' (Davidson) helps at all.


The 13 ideas with the same theme [claim that mental causation requires physicalism]:

The soul cannot be incorporeal, because then it could neither act nor be acted upon [Epicurus]
A body is required for anything to have causal relations [Zeno of Citium, by Cicero]
How can that which is unthinking be a cause of thought? [Berkeley]
Experienced time means no two mental moments are ever alike [Bergson]
Cause unites our picture of the universe; without it, mental and physical will separate [Davidson]
Davidson sees identity as between events, not states, since they are related in causation [Davidson, by Lowe]
Reductionists deny new causal powers at the higher level [Kim]
Without reductionism, mental causation is baffling [Kim]
It is absurd to think that physical effects are caused twice, so conscious causes must be physical [Papineau]
Overdetermination occurs if two events cause an effect, when each would have caused it alone [Crane]
If a car is a higher-level entity, distinct from its parts, how could it ever do anything? [Heil]
The appeal of the identity theory is its simplicity, and its solution to the mental causation problem [Heil]
The main argument for physicalism is its simple account of causation [Sturgeon]