more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 3499
[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / C. Functionalism / 8. Functionalism critique
]
Full Idea
Most of the works I have seen in the computational theory of the mind commit some variation on the homunculus fallacy.
Clarification
The homunculus fallacy says a person's mind contains a little person
Gist of Idea
Computation presupposes consciousness
Source
John Searle (The Rediscovery of the Mind [1992], Ch. 9.VI)
Book Ref
Searle,John R.: 'The Rediscovery of the Mind' [MIT 1999], p.212
A Reaction
This will be because there is an unspoken user for the inner computer. But see Fodor's view (Idea 2506). The key idea here is Dennett's: that not all regresses are vicious. My mind controller isn't like all of me.
Related Idea
Idea 2506
If I have a set of mental modules, someone had better be in charge of them! [Fodor]
The
18 ideas
with the same theme
[criticisms of the functionalist theory of mind]:
2348
|
Is there just one computational state for each specific belief?
[Putnam]
|
2332
|
Functionalism can't explain reference and truth, which are needed for logic
[Putnam]
|
2071
|
If concepts have external meaning, computational states won't explain psychology
[Putnam]
|
3499
|
Computation presupposes consciousness
[Searle]
|
3501
|
If we are computers, who is the user?
[Searle]
|
3393
|
How do functional states give rise to mental causation?
[Kim]
|
2578
|
Could a creature without a brain be in the right functional state for pain?
[Block]
|
2585
|
Not just any old functional network will have mental states
[Block]
|
2586
|
In functionalism, what are the special inputs and outputs of conscious creatures?
[Block]
|
3514
|
Functionalism needs causation and intentionality to explain actions
[Papineau]
|
7870
|
Role concepts either name the realising property, or the higher property constituting the role
[Papineau]
|
3206
|
One computer program could either play chess or fight a war
[Rey]
|
2418
|
The Chinese Mind doesn't seem conscious, but then nor do brains from outside
[Chalmers]
|
7062
|
Functionalism cannot explain consciousness just by functional organisation
[Heil]
|
4624
|
If you are a functionalist, there appears to be no room for qualia
[Heil]
|
6623
|
Functionalism can't distinguish our experiences in spectrum inversion
[Lowe]
|
6628
|
Functionalism only discusses relational properties of mental states, not intrinsic properties
[Lowe]
|
6629
|
Functionalism commits us to bizarre possibilities, such as 'zombies'
[Lowe]
|