more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 3767

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 1. Goodness / g. Consequentialism ]

Full Idea

The motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action, though much with the worth of the agent.

Gist of Idea

Motive shows the worth of the agent, but not of the action

Source

John Stuart Mill (Utilitarianism [1861], Ch.2)

Book Ref

Mill,John Stuart: 'Utilitarianism (including On Liberty etc)', ed/tr. Warnock,Mary [Fontana 1962], p.270


A Reaction

I think it is an error to try to separate these too sharply. Morality can't be purely consequential, because it would make earthquakes immoral. Actions indicate the worth of agents.


The 34 ideas with the same theme [only good consequences matter in morality]:

Mohists desire wealth, population and social order as the best consequences [Mozi, by Norden]
It is right to lie to someone, to get them to take medicine they are reluctant to take [Anon (Diss)]
An action is only just if it is performed by someone with a just character and outlook [Plato]
Clearly perfect conduct will involve both good intention and good action [Aristotle]
We judge people from their deeds because we cannot see their choices (which matter more) [Aristotle]
The function of good men is to confer benefits [Aristotle]
Good applies to goals, just as truth applies to ideas in the mind [Aquinas]
You can't assess moral actions without referring to the qualities of character that produce them [Leibniz]
A person isn't good if only tying their hands prevents their mischief, so the affections decide a person's morality [Shaftesbury]
My action is not made good by a good effect, if I did not foresee and intend it [Hutcheson]
If an attempted poisoning results in benefits, we still judge the agent a poisoner [Reid]
A good will is not good because of what it achieves [Kant]
The good of an action is in the mind of the doer, not the consequences [Kant]
Morality involves duty and respect for law, not love of the outcome [Kant]
Motive shows the worth of the agent, but not of the action [Mill]
In the earliest phase of human history only consequences mattered [Nietzsche]
Humans are vividly aware of short-term effects, and almost ignorant of the long-term ones [Nietzsche]
Utilitarians prefer consequences because intentions are unknowable - but so are consequences! [Nietzsche]
Conduct is not isolated from its effect on the moral code [Hart,HLA]
Consequentialists can hurt the innocent in order to prevent further wickedness [Foot]
Why might we think that a state of affairs can be morally good or bad? [Foot]
Good outcomes are not external guides to morality, but a part of virtuous actions [Foot]
The idea of a good state of affairs has no role in the thought of Aristotle, Rawls or Scanlon [Foot]
If the aim is good outcomes, why are killings worse than deaths? [Scheffler, by Foot]
Consequentialism assumes that situations can be compared [Williams,B]
For a consequentialist massacring 7 million must be better than massacring 7 million and one [Williams,B]
It is an error of consequentialism to think we just aim at certain states of affairs; we also want to act [Williams,B]
Maybe consequentialism is a critique of ordinary morality, rather than describing it [Harman]
You can't separate acts from the people performing them [Glover]
Negative consequences are very hard (and possibly impossible) to assess [Graham]
What matters for morality is the effects of action, not the psychological causes [Kekes]
Consequentialism emphasises value rather than obligation in morality [Scruton]
Teenagers are often quite wise about ideals, but rather stupid about consequences [Hursthouse]
Consequentialism wrongly assumes a clear line between an act and its consequences [Crisp,R]