more on this theme     |     more from this text

Single Idea 3860

[filed under theme 14. Science / C. Induction / 4. Reason in Induction ]

Full Idea

If Popper follows Hume in abandoning induction, there is no way in which he can justify the claims that there is growth of scientific knowledge and that science is a rational activity.

Gist of Idea

Science cannot be shown to be rational if induction is rejected

Source

comment on Karl Popper (The Logic of Scientific Discovery [1934]) by W.H. Newton-Smith - The Rationality of Science III.3

Book Ref

Newton-Smith,W.H.: 'The Rationality of Science' [RKP 1981], p.52

The 16 ideas from Karl Popper

12176 Science does not aim at ultimate explanations [Popper]
12175 Galilean science aimed at true essences, as the ultimate explanations [Popper]
12179 Essentialist views of science prevent further questions from being raised [Popper]
12177 Human artefacts may have essences, in their purposes [Popper]
7779 There is no such thing as induction [Popper, by Magee]
22188 Give Nobel Prizes for really good refutations? [Gorham on Popper]
7780 Falsification is the criterion of demarcation between science and non-science [Popper, by Magee]
16830 We don't only reject hypotheses because we have falsified them [Lipton on Popper]
6794 If falsification requires logical inconsistency, then probabilistic statements can't be falsified [Bird on Popper]
6795 When Popper gets in difficulties, he quietly uses induction to help out [Bird on Popper]
3856 Good theories have empirical content, explain a lot, and are not falsified [Popper, by Newton-Smith]
3860 Science cannot be shown to be rational if induction is rejected [Newton-Smith on Popper]
22358 Scientific objectivity lies in inter-subjective testing [Popper]
5451 Popper felt that ancient essentialism was a bar to progress [Popper, by Mautner]
18284 Particulars can be verified or falsified, but general statements can only be falsified (conclusively) [Popper]
11946 Propensities are part of a situation, not part of the objects [Popper]