more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
What theory of morals can ever serve any useful purpose, unless it can show, by a particular detail, that all the duties which it recommends, are also the true interest of each individual?
Gist of Idea
No moral theory is of any use if it doesn't serve the interests of the individual concerned
Source
David Hume (Enquiry concerning Principles of Morals [1751], IX.II.228)
Book Ref
Hume,David: 'Enquiries Conc. Human Understanding, Morals', ed/tr. Selby-Bigge/Nidditch [OUP 1975], p.280
A Reaction
It is hard to disagree, even if occasional cases of extreme altruism can occur.
| 3919 | Conclusions of reason do not affect our emotions or decisions to act [Hume] |
| 3918 | Moral philosophy aims to show us our duty [Hume] |
| 23560 | If we all naturally had everything we could ever desire, the virtue of justice would be irrelevant [Hume] |
| 3920 | If you equalise possessions, people's talents will make them unequal again [Hume] |
| 3921 | The safety of the people is the supreme law [Hume] |
| 3922 | Justice only exists to support society [Hume] |
| 3925 | Personal Merit is the possession of useful or agreeable mental qualities [Hume] |
| 3926 | The human heart has a natural concern for public good [Hume] |
| 3929 | No moral theory is of any use if it doesn't serve the interests of the individual concerned [Hume] |
| 3928 | Virtue just requires careful calculation and a preference for the greater happiness [Hume] |
| 3927 | Society prefers helpful lies to harmful truth [Hume] |
| 3923 | No one would cause pain to a complete stranger who happened to be passing [Hume] |
| 3924 | Nature makes private affections come first, because public concerns are spread too thinly [Hume] |