more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4009

[filed under theme 28. God / A. Divine Nature / 6. Divine Morality / d. God decrees morality ]

Full Idea

Late medieval nominalism defended the sovereignty of God as incompatible with there being an order in nature which by itself defined good and bad.

Clarification

'Nominalists' were opponents of Plato's theory of Forms

Gist of Idea

Nominalists defended the sovereignty of God against the idea of natural existing good and evil

Source

Charles Taylor (Sources of the Self [1989], §3.3)

Book Ref

Taylor,Charles: 'Sources of the Self' [CUP 1992], p.82


A Reaction

Part of their attack on Platonism. But what made them place such a high value on the sovereignty of God?


The 16 ideas with the same theme [God as the authority behind morality]:

In 'The Laws', to obey the law is to be obey god [Plato, by MacIntyre]
Stoics teach that law is identical with right reason, which is the will of Zeus [Chrysippus, by Diog. Laertius]
The source of all justice is Zeus and the universal nature [Chrysippus]
God doesn't obey the laws of nature; they are subject to the law of God [Cicero]
William of Ockham is the main spokesman for God's commands being the source of morality [William of Ockham]
Ideas in God's mind only have value if he makes it so [Descartes]
If the will and pleasure of God controls justice, then anything wicked or unjust would become good if God commanded it [Cudworth]
The requirement that God must be obeyed must precede any authority of God's commands [Cudworth]
The finite and dependent should obey the supreme and infinite [Locke]
If goodness is constituted by God's will, it is a tautology to say God's will is good [Hutcheson]
Abraham was willing to suspend ethics, for a higher idea [Kierkegaard]
Morality can only be upheld by belief in God and a 'hereafter' [Nietzsche]
Morality cannot survive when the God who sanctions it is missing [Nietzsche]
Without God there is no intelligibility or value [Sartre]
Nominalists defended the sovereignty of God against the idea of natural existing good and evil [Taylor,C]
How could God have obligations? What law could possibly impose them? [Davies,B]