more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4091

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / D. Property Dualism / 1. Reductionism critique ]

Full Idea

The fundamental problems of misrepresentation and error have dogged physicalist reductions of intentionality.

Clarification

'Intentionality' is the capacity of minds to think about things

Gist of Idea

The problems of misrepresentation and error have dogged physicalist reductions of intentionality

Source

Tim Crane (Elements of Mind [2001], 3.26)

Book Ref

Crane,Tim: 'Elements of Mind' [OUP 2001], p.89


A Reaction

If footprints or tree-rings are the model for reductions of intentionality, there doesn't seem much scope in them for giving false information, except by some freak event.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [arguments against reducing mind to brain]:

Reduction is impossible because mind is holistic and brain isn't [Davidson, by Maslin]
If the mind is an anomaly, this makes reduction of the mental to the physical impossible [Davidson]
Consciousness has a first-person ontology, so it cannot be reduced without omitting something [Searle]
Maybe intentionality is reducible, but qualia aren't [Kim]
Reductionism is impossible if there aren't any 'bridge laws' between mental and physical [Kim]
Reductionism gets stuck with qualia [Kim]
The problems of misrepresentation and error have dogged physicalist reductions of intentionality [Crane]
Higher-level sciences cannot be reduced, because their concepts mark boundaries invisible at lower levels [Heil]
Higher-level sciences designate real properties of objects, which are not reducible to lower levels [Heil]
Rule-following can't be reduced to the physical [Sturgeon]