more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 4123

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / B. Contract Ethics / 1. Contractarianism ]

Full Idea

Rawls's theory is an elaboration of a simple idea: a fair system of arrangements is one that the parties can agree to without knowing how it will benefit them personally.

Gist of Idea

A fair arrangement is one that parties can agree to without knowing how it will benefit them personally

Source

report of John Rawls (A Theory of Justice [1972]) by Bernard Williams - Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy Ch.5

Book Ref

Williams,Bernard: 'Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy' [Fontana 1985], p.78


A Reaction

The essence of modern Kantian contractualism. It is an appealing principle for building a rational world, but I hear Nietzsche turning in his grave.


The 14 ideas from 'A Theory of Justice'

Why does the rational agreement of the 'Original Position' in Rawls make it right? [Nagel on Rawls]
The original position models the idea that citizens start as free and equal [Rawls, by Swift]
Rawls defends the priority of right over good [Rawls, by Finlayson]
A fair arrangement is one that parties can agree to without knowing how it will benefit them personally [Rawls, by Williams,B]
Utilitarians lump persons together; Rawls somewhat separates them; Nozick wholly separates them [Swift on Rawls]
Rawls's account of justice relies on conventional fairness, avoiding all moral controversy [Gray on Rawls]
The social contract has problems with future generations, national boundaries, disabilities and animals [Rawls, by Nussbaum]
Choose justice principles in ignorance of your own social situation [Rawls]
All desirable social features should be equal, unless inequality favours the disadvantaged [Rawls]
Justice concerns not natural distributions, or our born location, but what we do about them [Rawls]
Liberty Principle: everyone has an equal right to liberties, if compatible with others' liberties [Rawls]
Human injustice is not a permanent feature of communities [Rawls]
If an aggression is unjust, the constraints on how it is fought are much stricter [Rawls]
Utilitarianism inappropriately scales up the individual willingness to make sacrifices [Rawls, by Nagel]