more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 4129

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / E. Utilitarianism / 1. Utilitarianism ]

Full Idea

It is a self-evident principle that the good of one individual is of no more importance, from the point of view of the Universe, than the good of any other, ..and as a rational being I am bound to aim at good generally, not merely at a particular part.

Gist of Idea

It is self-evident (from the point of view of the Universe) that no individual has more importance than another

Source

Henry Sidgwick (The Methods of Ethics (7th edn) [1874], III.XIII.3)

Book Ref

Sidgwick,Henry: 'The Methods of Ethics (7th edn)' [Hackett 1981], p.382


A Reaction

Showing that even a very empirical theory like utilitarianism has an a priori basis. Of course, the principle is false. What about animals, the senile, criminals, androids? What bestows 'importance'?


The 4 ideas from 'The Methods of Ethics (7th edn)'

Self-interest is not rational, if the self is just a succession of memories and behaviour [Sidgwick, by Gray]
Sidwick argues for utilitarian institutions, rather than actions [Sidgwick, by Tuckness/Wolf]
It is self-evident (from the point of view of the Universe) that no individual has more importance than another [Sidgwick]
If we say that freedom depends on rationality, the irrational actions are not free [Sidgwick]