more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4208

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 9. Counterfactual Claims ]

Full Idea

Counterfactual analyses of event causation don't seem to work, because 'if Napoleon hadn't been born he wouldn't have died' is true, but doesn't mean his birth caused his death.

Clarification

'Counterfactual' analysis is based on 'If so-and-so happened..'

Gist of Idea

'If he wasn't born he wouldn't have died' doesn't mean birth causes death, so causation isn't counterfactual

Source

E.J. Lowe (A Survey of Metaphysics [2002], p.161)

Book Ref

Lowe,E.J.: 'A Survey of Metaphysics' [OUP 2002], p.161


A Reaction

Nice counterexample, which looks pretty conclusive. Birth makes death possible; it creates the necessary conditions within which it can be caused.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [laws as involving claims about other possible worlds]:

In counterfactuals we keep substances constant, and imagine new situations for them [Harré]
Many counterfactual truths do not imply causation ('if yesterday wasn't Monday, it isn't Tuesday') [Kim, by Psillos]
Lewis's account of counterfactuals is fine if we know what a law of nature is, but it won't explain the latter [Cohen,LJ on Lewis]
An event causes another just if the second event would not have happened without the first [Lewis, by Psillos]
Laws are true generalisations which support counterfactuals and are confirmed by instances [Fodor]
'If he wasn't born he wouldn't have died' doesn't mean birth causes death, so causation isn't counterfactual [Lowe]
Dowe commends the Conserved Quantity theory as it avoids mention of counterfactuals [Dowe, by Psillos]
In some counterfactuals, the counterfactual event happens later than its consequent [Psillos]
Counterfactual theories say causes make a difference - if c hadn't occurred, then e wouldn't occur [Psillos]
Essentialism can't use conditionals to explain regularities, because of possible interventions [Bird]