more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4237

[filed under theme 18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 5. Abstracta by Negation ]

Full Idea

Concrete objects possess causal powers and relations, but abstract objects are incapable of having causal powers or relations.

Gist of Idea

Concrete and abstract objects are distinct because the former have causal powers and relations

Source

E.J. Lowe (A Survey of Metaphysics [2002], p.368)

Book Ref

Lowe,E.J.: 'A Survey of Metaphysics' [OUP 2002], p.368


A Reaction

Is this an observation or a definition? One might claim that an abstraction (such as a political ideal) can acquire causal power through a conscious mnd.


The 7 ideas with the same theme [defining abstractions by specifying what they are not]:

Abstractions lack causes, effects and spatio-temporal locations [Mellor/Oliver]
Concrete and abstract objects are distinct because the former have causal powers and relations [Lowe]
The centre of mass of the solar system is a non-causal abstract object, despite having a location [Lowe]
Nowadays abstractions are defined as non-spatial, causally inert things [Rosen]
Chess may be abstract, but it has existed in specific space and time [Rosen]
Sets are said to be abstract and non-spatial, but a set of books can be on a shelf [Rosen]
Abstractions are imperceptible, non-causal, and non-spatiotemporal (the third explaining the others) [Szabó]