more on this theme     |     more from this text

Single Idea 4335

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 1. Deontology ]

Full Idea

If morality is strongly 'codifiable', it should consist of rules which provide a decision procedure, and it should be equally applicable by the virtuous and the non-virtuous, without recourse to wisdom.

Gist of Idea

'Codifiable' morality give rules for decisions which don't require wisdom

Source

Rosalind Hursthouse (On Virtue Ethics [1999], Ch.2)

Book Ref

Hursthouse,Rosalind: 'On Virtue Ethics' [OUP 2001], p.56

A Reaction

A key idea. Religions want obedience, and Kant wants morality to be impersonal, and most people want morality which simple uneducated people can follow. And yet how can wisdom ever be irrelevant?

The 31 ideas from Rosalind Hursthouse

4325 Must all actions be caused in part by a desire, or can a belief on its own be sufficient? [Hursthouse]
4324 Animals and plants can 'flourish', but only rational beings can have eudaimonia [Hursthouse]
4327 Deontologists do consider consequences, because they reveal when a rule might apply [Hursthouse]
4328 Preference utilitarianism aims to be completely value-free, or empirical [Hursthouse]
4335 'Codifiable' morality give rules for decisions which don't require wisdom [Hursthouse]
4329 After a moral dilemma is resolved there is still a 'remainder', requiring (say) regret [Hursthouse]
4330 Deontologists resolve moral dilemmas by saying the rule conflict is merely apparent [Hursthouse]
4336 Any strict ranking of virtues or rules gets abandoned when faced with particular cases [Hursthouse]
4334 Virtue ethics is open to the objection that it fails to show priority among the virtues [Hursthouse]
4337 Teenagers are often quite wise about ideals, but rather stupid about consequences [Hursthouse]
4341 Involuntary actions performed in tragic dilemmas are bad because they mar a good life [Hursthouse]
4338 Deontologists usually accuse utilitarians of oversimplifying hard cases [Hursthouse]
4343 We are torn between utilitarian and deontological views of lying, depending on the examples [Hursthouse]
4339 According to virtue ethics, two agents may respond differently, and yet both be right [Hursthouse]
4340 You are not a dishonest person if a tragic dilemma forces you to do something dishonest [Hursthouse]
4346 The emotions of sympathy, compassion and love are no guarantee of right action or acting well [Hursthouse]
4351 It is a fantasy that only through the study of philosophy can one become virtuous [Hursthouse]
4349 Virtuous people may not be fully clear about their reasons for action [Hursthouse]
4350 If people are virtuous in obedience to God, would they become wicked if they lost their faith? [Hursthouse]
4356 We are puzzled by a person who can show an exceptional virtue and also behave very badly [Hursthouse]
4352 Performing an act simply because it is virtuous is sufficient to be 'morally motivated' or 'dutiful' [Hursthouse]
4353 If moral motivation is an all-or-nothing sense of duty, how can children act morally? [Hursthouse]
4354 Maybe in a deeply poisoned character none of their milder character traits could ever be a virtue [Hursthouse]
4355 There may be inverse akrasia, where the agent's action is better than their judgement recommends [Hursthouse]
4359 When it comes to bringing up children, most of us think that the virtues are the best bet [Hursthouse]
4358 Virtue may be neither sufficient nor necessary for eudaimonia [Hursthouse]
4361 Good animals can survive, breed, feel characteristic pleasure and pain, and contribute to the group [Hursthouse]
4364 Being unusually virtuous in some areas may entail being less virtuous in others [Hursthouse]
4363 The word 'person' is useless in ethics, because what counts as a good or bad self-conscious being? [Hursthouse]
4365 We are distinct from other animals in behaving rationally - pursuing something as good, for reasons [Hursthouse]
20195 Eudaimonia first; virtue is a trait which promotes it; right acts are what virtues produce [Hursthouse, by Zagzebski]