more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4339

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / C. Virtue Theory / 2. Elements of Virtue Theory / i. Absolute virtues ]

Full Idea

According to virtue ethics, in a given situation two different agents may do what is right, what gets a tick of approval, despite the fact that each fails to do what the other did.

Gist of Idea

According to virtue ethics, two agents may respond differently, and yet both be right

Source

Rosalind Hursthouse (On Virtue Ethics [1999], Ch.3)

Book Ref

Hursthouse,Rosalind: 'On Virtue Ethics' [OUP 2001], p.69


A Reaction

You could certainly have great respect for two entirely different decisions about a medical dilemma, if they both showed integrity and good will, even if one had worse consequences than the other.


The 6 ideas with the same theme [virtues that have no compromise or mean]:

There is no right time or place or way or person for the committing of adultery; it is just wrong [Aristotle]
One must avoid even speaking of evil deeds [Democritus (attr)]
Legal justice is supreme, because it directs the other virtues to the common good [Aquinas]
Egoism is the only evil, love the only good; genuine love produces all the other virtues [Feuerbach]
Some things we would never do, even for the highest ideals [Nietzsche]
According to virtue ethics, two agents may respond differently, and yet both be right [Hursthouse]