more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 4351

[filed under theme 20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 3. Acting on Reason / b. Intellectualism ]

Full Idea

It is a fantasy that only through the study of philosophy can one become virtuous.

Gist of Idea

It is a fantasy that only through the study of philosophy can one become virtuous

Source

Rosalind Hursthouse (On Virtue Ethics [1999], Ch.6)

Book Ref

Hursthouse,Rosalind: 'On Virtue Ethics' [OUP 2001], p.137


A Reaction

I personally believe that philosophy is the best route yet devised to the achievement of virtue, but it is clearly not essential. All the philosophers I meet are remarkably virtuous, but that may be a chicken/egg thing.


The 30 ideas from 'On Virtue Ethics'

Must all actions be caused in part by a desire, or can a belief on its own be sufficient? [Hursthouse]
Animals and plants can 'flourish', but only rational beings can have eudaimonia [Hursthouse]
Deontologists do consider consequences, because they reveal when a rule might apply [Hursthouse]
Preference utilitarianism aims to be completely value-free, or empirical [Hursthouse]
'Codifiable' morality give rules for decisions which don't require wisdom [Hursthouse]
After a moral dilemma is resolved there is still a 'remainder', requiring (say) regret [Hursthouse]
Deontologists resolve moral dilemmas by saying the rule conflict is merely apparent [Hursthouse]
Any strict ranking of virtues or rules gets abandoned when faced with particular cases [Hursthouse]
Virtue ethics is open to the objection that it fails to show priority among the virtues [Hursthouse]
Teenagers are often quite wise about ideals, but rather stupid about consequences [Hursthouse]
According to virtue ethics, two agents may respond differently, and yet both be right [Hursthouse]
We are torn between utilitarian and deontological views of lying, depending on the examples [Hursthouse]
Involuntary actions performed in tragic dilemmas are bad because they mar a good life [Hursthouse]
Deontologists usually accuse utilitarians of oversimplifying hard cases [Hursthouse]
You are not a dishonest person if a tragic dilemma forces you to do something dishonest [Hursthouse]
The emotions of sympathy, compassion and love are no guarantee of right action or acting well [Hursthouse]
It is a fantasy that only through the study of philosophy can one become virtuous [Hursthouse]
Virtuous people may not be fully clear about their reasons for action [Hursthouse]
If people are virtuous in obedience to God, would they become wicked if they lost their faith? [Hursthouse]
Maybe in a deeply poisoned character none of their milder character traits could ever be a virtue [Hursthouse]
We are puzzled by a person who can show an exceptional virtue and also behave very badly [Hursthouse]
Performing an act simply because it is virtuous is sufficient to be 'morally motivated' or 'dutiful' [Hursthouse]
If moral motivation is an all-or-nothing sense of duty, how can children act morally? [Hursthouse]
There may be inverse akrasia, where the agent's action is better than their judgement recommends [Hursthouse]
Virtue may be neither sufficient nor necessary for eudaimonia [Hursthouse]
When it comes to bringing up children, most of us think that the virtues are the best bet [Hursthouse]
Good animals can survive, breed, feel characteristic pleasure and pain, and contribute to the group [Hursthouse]
Being unusually virtuous in some areas may entail being less virtuous in others [Hursthouse]
The word 'person' is useless in ethics, because what counts as a good or bad self-conscious being? [Hursthouse]
We are distinct from other animals in behaving rationally - pursuing something as good, for reasons [Hursthouse]