more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4383

[filed under theme 20. Action / B. Preliminaries of Action / 2. Willed Action / d. Weakness of will ]

Full Idea

Aristotle's discussion of akrasia seems to leave the vital point unexplained, which is why the better syllogism is overcome.

Clarification

'Akratic' actions are those which lack self-control

Gist of Idea

Aristotle seems not to explain why the better syllogism is overcome in akratic actions

Source

comment on Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1102b14) by Myles F. Burnyeat - Aristotle on Learning to be Good p.85

Book Ref

'Essays on Aristotle's Ethics', ed/tr. Rorty,Amélie Oksenberg [University of California 1980], p.85


A Reaction

The problem is where exactly the action originates within us - is it sometimes from deliberation, and sometimes from some irrational force? Either akrasia is easy and action baffling, or vice versa.


The 30 ideas with the same theme [failing to perform the action which is judged best]:

Some reasonings are stronger than we are [Philolaus]
The common belief is that people can know the best without acting on it [Socrates]
No one willingly commits an evil or base act [Socrates]
Socrates did not accept the tripartite soul (which permits akrasia) [Vlastos on Socrates]
People do what they think they should do, and only ever do what they think they should do [Socrates, by Xenophon]
Socrates was shocked by the idea of akrasia, but observation shows that it happens [Aristotle on Socrates]
Self-controlled follow understanding, when it is opposed to desires [Aristotle]
Aristotle seems not to explain why the better syllogism is overcome in akratic actions [Burnyeat on Aristotle]
The akrates acts from desire not choice, and the enkrates acts from choice not desire [Aristotle]
Virtue is right reason and feeling and action. Akrasia and enkrateia are lower levels of action. [Aristotle, by Cottingham]
Akrasia merely neglects or misunderstands knowledge, rather than opposing it [Achtenberg on Aristotle]
Some people explain akrasia by saying only opinion is present, not knowledge [Aristotle]
A person may act against one part of his knowledge, if he knows both universal and particular [Aristotle]
Aristotle sees akrasia as acting against what is chosen, not against reason [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
Akrasia is explained by past mental failures, not by a specific choice [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
Licentious people feel no regret, but weak-willed people are capable of repentance [Aristotle]
Akrasia is the clash of two feelings - goodness and pleasure [Aristotle]
A community can lack self-control [Aristotle]
Passions are judgements; greed thinks money is honorable, and likewise drinking and lust [Chrysippus, by Diog. Laertius]
Limited awareness leads to bad choices, and unconscious awareness makes us choose the bad [Leibniz, by Perkins]
Socrates neglects the gap between knowing what is good and doing good [Kierkegaard, by Carlisle]
We need lower and higher drives, but they must be under firm control [Nietzsche]
There is no will; weakness of will is splitting of impulses, strong will is coordination under one impulse [Nietzsche]
Weakness of will is the inadequacy of the original impetus to carry through the action [Weil]
The causally strongest reason may not be the reason the actor judges to be best [Davidson]
We judge weakness of will by an assessment after the event is concluded [Williams,B, by Cottingham]
Akrasia is intelligible in hindsight, when we revisit our previous emotions [Blackburn]
There may be inverse akrasia, where the agent's action is better than their judgement recommends [Hursthouse]
Akrasia can be either overruling our deliberation, or failing to deliberate [Goldie]
If you can judge one act as best, then do another, this supports an inward-looking view of agency [Stout,R]