more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4421

[filed under theme 11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 5. Aiming at Truth ]

Full Idea

Both the earliest and most recent philosophers are all oblivious of how much the will to truth itself first requires justification: here there is a gap in every philosophy - how did this come about?

Gist of Idea

Philosophers have never asked why there is a will to truth in the first place

Source

Friedrich Nietzsche (On the Genealogy of Morals [1887], III.§24)

Book Ref

Nietzsche,Friedrich: 'On the Genealogy of Morals/ Ecce Homo', ed/tr. Kaufmann,Walter [Vintage 1969], p.152


A Reaction

This seems to me a meta-philosophical question which will lead off into (quite interesting) cultural studies and (trite) evolutionary theory. Truth isn't a value, it is the biological function of brains.


The 5 ideas with the same theme [sole aim of knowledge is awareness of the truth]:

Philosophers have never asked why there is a will to truth in the first place [Nietzsche]
Truth is a species of good, being whatever proves itself good in the way of belief [James]
We have a basic epistemic duty to believe truth and avoid error [Chisholm, by Kvanvig]
Knowledge either aims at a quantity of truths, or a quality of understanding of truths [Zagzebski]
Making sense of things, or finding a good theory, are non-truth-related cognitive successes [Kvanvig]