more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4426

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 1. Goodness / i. Moral luck ]

Full Idea

I should prefer to exclude the bad result, the consequences, from the question of value as a matter of principle. Faced with a bad result, one loses all too easily the right perspective for what one has done.

Gist of Idea

A bad result distorts one's judgement about the virtue of what one has done

Source

Friedrich Nietzsche (Ecce Homo [1889], Clever §1)

Book Ref

Nietzsche,Friedrich: 'On the Genealogy of Morals/ Ecce Homo', ed/tr. Kaufmann,Walter [Vintage 1969], p.236


A Reaction

If the perspective is easily lost, we should make more effort, not ignore consequences. The question is whether you could have foreseen or controlled the consequences.


The 9 ideas with the same theme [problem of unexpected moral outcomes]:

Attempted murder is like real murder, but we should respect the luck which avoided total ruin [Plato]
Sooner a good decision going wrong, than a bad one turning out for the good [Epicurus]
A carelessly thrown brick is condemned much more if it hits someone [Smith,A, by Harman]
Punishment has distorted the pure innocence of the contingency of outcomes [Nietzsche]
A bad result distorts one's judgement about the virtue of what one has done [Nietzsche]
If all that matters in morality is motive and intention, that makes moral luck irrelevant [Williams,B]
Moral luck can arise in character, preconditions, actual circumstances, and outcome [Nagel]
We can't criticise people because of unforeseeable consequences [Graham]
Moral luck means our praise and blame may exceed our control or awareness [Zagzebski]