more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4453

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 1. Universals ]

Full Idea

One version of realism says that the universal does not enter into the being of its instances, and thus is a One-Over-Many. One version of this is the model/copy view, but this is not widely held, because of difficulties such as the Third Man Argument.

Clarification

The 'Third Man' involves using a model to identify the model, which gives an infinite regress

Gist of Idea

One realism is one-over-many, which may be the model/copy view, which has the Third Man problem

Source

J.P. Moreland (Universals [2001], Ch.1)

Book Ref

Moreland,J.P.: 'Universals' [Acumen 2001], p.7


A Reaction

This presumably arises if the model is held to have the properties of the copy (self-predication), and looks like a bad theory


The 24 ideas from J.P. Moreland

If properties are universals, what distinguishes two things which have identical properties? [Moreland]
The traditional problem of universals centres on the "One over Many", which is the unity of natural classes [Moreland]
One realism is one-over-many, which may be the model/copy view, which has the Third Man problem [Moreland]
Evidence for universals can be found in language, communication, natural laws, classification and ideals [Moreland]
The One-In-Many view says universals have abstract existence, but exist in particulars [Moreland]
Maybe universals are real, if properties themselves have properties, and relate to other properties [Moreland]
Moderate nominalism attempts to embrace the existence of properties while avoiding universals [Moreland]
Unlike Class Nominalism, Resemblance Nominalism can distinguish natural from unnatural classes [Moreland]
There can be predicates with no property, and there are properties with no predicate [Moreland]
Epistemological Ockham's Razor demands good reasons, but the ontological version says reality is simple [Moreland]
It is always open to a philosopher to claim that some entity or other is unanalysable [Moreland]
Abstractions are formed by the mind when it concentrates on some, but not all, the features of a thing [Moreland]
Tropes are like Hume's 'impressions', conceived as real rather than as ideal [Moreland]
A colour-trope cannot be simple (as required), because it is spread in space, and so it is complex [Moreland]
In 'four colours were used in the decoration', colours appear to be universals, not tropes [Moreland]
Realists see properties as universals, which are single abstract entities which are multiply exemplifiable [Moreland]
A naturalist and realist about universals is forced to say redness can be both moving and stationary [Moreland]
There are spatial facts about red particulars, but not about redness itself [Moreland]
How could 'being even', or 'being a father', or a musical interval, exist naturally in space? [Moreland]
We should abandon the concept of a property since (unlike sets) their identity conditions are unclear [Moreland]
Existence theories must match experience, possibility, logic and knowledge, and not be self-defeating [Moreland]
Redness is independent of red things, can do without them, has its own properties, and has identity [Moreland]
'Presentism' is the view that only the present moment exists [Moreland]
Most philosophers think that the identity of indiscernibles is false [Moreland]