more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 4545

[filed under theme 2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 5. Objectivity ]

Full Idea

Could not the objective character of things be merely a difference of degree within the subjective?

Gist of Idea

Could not the objective character of things be merely a difference of degree within the subjective?

Source

Friedrich Nietzsche (The Will to Power (notebooks) [1888], §560)

Book Ref

Nietzsche,Friedrich: 'The Will to Power', ed/tr. Kaufmann,W /Hollingdate,R [Vintage 1968], p.303

A Reaction

A reasonable speculation. I begin to feel my opinions are objective if they are reinforced by the agreement of others. One can believe in the facts, but despair of objectivity. It is called 'scepticism'. Buf cf. T.Nagel.

The 38 ideas with the same theme [seeing reality without a personal point of view]:

24018 One truth leads us to another [Descartes]
22024 Fichte's subjectivity struggles to then give any account of objectivity [Pinkard on Fichte]
15626 Categories create objective experience, but are too conditioned by things to actually grasp them [Hegel]
22768 Subjective and objective are not firmly opposed, but merge into one another [Hegel]
22037 Objectivity is not by correspondence, but by the historical determined necessity of Geist [Hegel, by Pinkard]
5297 Whether human thinking can be 'true' must be decided in practice, not theory [Marx]
24084 Seeing with other eyes is more egoism, but exploring other perspectives leads to objectivity [Nietzsche]
23722 Objectivity is not disinterestedness (impossible), but the ability to switch perspectives [Nietzsche]
9832 Frege sees no 'intersubjective' category, between objective and subjective [Dummett on Frege]
8414 Keep the psychological and subjective separate from the logical and objective [Frege]
7740 There exists a realm, beyond objects and ideas, of non-spatio-temporal thoughts [Frege, by Weiner]
4545 Could not the objective character of things be merely a difference of degree within the subjective? [Nietzsche]
22648 A single explanation must have a single point of view [James]
22366 There is no objectivity in social sciences - only viewpoints for selecting and organising data [Weber]
22367 The results of social research can be true, and not just subjectively valid for one person [Weber]
22361 Contextual values are acceptable in research, but not in its final evaluation [Reichenbach, by Reiss/Sprenger]
22358 Scientific objectivity lies in inter-subjective testing [Popper]
17621 What matters in mathematics is its objectivity, not the existence of the objects [Dummett]
3969 There are no ultimate standards of rationality, since we only assess others by our own standard [Davidson]
3972 Truth and objectivity depend on a community of speakers to interpret what they mean [Davidson]
8868 Objective truth arises from interpersonal communication [Davidson]
20989 Views are objective if they don't rely on a person's character, social position or species [Nagel]
22354 Things cause perceptions, properties have other effects, hence we reach a 'view from nowhere' [Nagel, by Reiss/Sprenger]
3248 Realism invites scepticism because it claims to be objective [Nagel]
7975 The task of philosophy is to unmask the illusion of objective reality [Baudrillard]
21373 We become objective when we detach ourselves from the world [Janaway]
23966 The personal view can still be objective, so I call sciences 'impersonal', rather than objective [Goldie]
19649 Since Kant, objectivity is defined not by the object, but by the statement's potential universality [Meillassoux]
20982 In politics and ethics, scrutiny from different perspectives is essential for objectivity [Sen]
23277 Modern pragmatism sees objectivity as possible, despite its gradual evolution [Misak]
22353 One view says objectivity is making a successful claim which captures the facts [Reiss/Sprenger]
22356 An absolute scientific picture of reality must not involve sense experience, which is perspectival [Reiss/Sprenger]
22359 Topic and application involve values, but can evidence and theory choice avoid them? [Reiss/Sprenger]
22360 The Value-Free Ideal in science avoids contextual values, but embraces epistemic values [Reiss/Sprenger]
22362 Value-free science needs impartial evaluation, theories asserting facts, and right motivation [Reiss/Sprenger]
22364 Thermometers depend on the substance used, and none of them are perfect [Reiss/Sprenger]
20923 We take part in objective truth, rather than observe it from a distance [Zimmermann,J]
20926 Hermeneutic knowledge is not objective, but embraces interpretations [Zimmermann,J]