more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 4571

[filed under theme 19. Language / B. Reference / 1. Reference theories ]

Full Idea

Reference need not be a hit-or-miss affair.

Gist of Idea

Reference need not be a hit-or-miss affair

Source

David E. Cooper (Philosophy and the Nature of Language [1973], §4.2)

Book Ref

Cooper,David E.: 'Philosophy and the Nature of Language' [Longman 1979], p.85


A Reaction

Sounds right. If the basic scenario is picking someone out in a crowd, your listener may think they know which person you are talking about, with a high degree of probability.


The 13 ideas from 'Philosophy and the Nature of Language'

Many sentences set up dispositions which are irrelevant to the meanings of the sentences [Cooper,DE]
'How now brown cow?' is used for elocution, but this says nothing about its meaning [Cooper,DE]
Most people know how to use the word "Amen", but they do not know what it means [Cooper,DE]
I can meaningfully speculate that humans may have experiences currently impossible for us [Cooper,DE]
The verification principle itself seems neither analytic nor verifiable [Cooper,DE]
Any thesis about reference is also a thesis about what exists to be referred to [Cooper,DE]
If 'Queen of England' does not refer if there is no queen, its meaning can't refer if there is one [Cooper,DE]
Reference need not be a hit-or-miss affair [Cooper,DE]
If predicates name things, that reduces every sentence to a mere list of names [Cooper,DE]
If it is claimed that language correlates with culture, we must be able to identify the two independently [Cooper,DE]
A person's language doesn't prove their concepts, but how are concepts deduced apart from language? [Cooper,DE]
If some peoples do not have categories like time or cause, they can't be essential features of rationality [Cooper,DE]
An analytic truth is one which becomes a logical truth when some synonyms have been replaced [Cooper,DE]