more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4575

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / E. Relativism / 5. Language Relativism ]

Full Idea

It would be absurd to say the Hopi lack the concept of time because they lack tensed verbs, ..but how do we find out what a man's concepts are except in terms of his language?

Gist of Idea

A person's language doesn't prove their concepts, but how are concepts deduced apart from language?

Source

David E. Cooper (Philosophy and the Nature of Language [1973], §5.2)

Book Ref

Cooper,David E.: 'Philosophy and the Nature of Language' [Longman 1979], p.115


A Reaction

Presumably we should look at animals, where concepts must be inferred in order to explain behaviour. I don't see why introspection (scientifically wicked) should not also be employed to detect our own non-verbal concepts. How are new words invented?


The 7 ideas with the same theme [role of language in shaping human knowledge]:

Hopi consistently prefers verbs and events to nouns and things [Whorf]
Language arranges sensory experience to form a world-order [Whorf]
Two things are relative - the background theory, and translating the object theory into the background theory [Quine]
If it is claimed that language correlates with culture, we must be able to identify the two independently [Cooper,DE]
A person's language doesn't prove their concepts, but how are concepts deduced apart from language? [Cooper,DE]
Our sortal concepts fix what we find in experience [Wiggins]
People still say the Hopi have no time concepts, despite Whorf's later denial [Devlin]