more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 4608

[filed under theme 15. Nature of Minds / A. Nature of Mind / 1. Mind / e. Questions about mind ]

Full Idea

Dennett identifies a hierarchy of minds running from 'Darwinian' (hard-wired solutions to problems), to 'Skinnerian' (trial-and-error), to 'Popperian' (anticipating possible experience), to 'Gregorian' (self-conscious representation, probably linguistic).

Gist of Idea

Minds are hard-wired, or trial-and-error, or experimental, or full self-aware

Source

report of Daniel C. Dennett (Kinds of Minds [1996]) by John Heil - Philosophy of Mind Ch.5

Book Ref

Heil,John: 'Philosophy of Mind' [Routledge 1998], p.162


A Reaction

Interesting. The concept of an experiment seems a major step (assessing reality against an internal map), and the ability to think about one's own thoughts certainly strikes me as the mark of a top level mind. Maybe that is the importance of language.


The 12 ideas from 'Kinds of Minds'

Minds are hard-wired, or trial-and-error, or experimental, or full self-aware [Dennett, by Heil]
What is it like to notice an uncomfortable position when you are asleep? [Dennett]
Most people see an abortion differently if the foetus lacks a brain [Dennett]
We descend from robots, and our intentionality is composed of billions of crude intentional systems [Dennett]
The predecessor and rival of the language of thought hypothesis is the picture theory of ideas [Dennett]
Maybe plants are very slow (and sentient) animals, overlooked because we are faster? [Dennett]
The materials for a mind only matter because of speed, and a need for transducers and effectors [Dennett]
There is no more anger in adrenaline than silliness in a bottle of whiskey [Dennett]
Maybe there is a minimum brain speed for supporting a mind [Dennett]
Sentience comes in grades from robotic to super-human; we only draw a line for moral reasons [Dennett]
Being a person must involve having second-order beliefs and desires (about beliefs and desires) [Dennett]
Concepts are things we (unlike dogs) can think about, because we have language [Dennett]