more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4658

[filed under theme 20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 5. Action Dilemmas / c. Omissions ]

Full Idea

The acts and omissions doctrine says failure to perform an act, when there are foreseen bad consequences of the failure, is usually better than performing a different act which has the same foreseen consequences.

Gist of Idea

Acts and Omissions: bad consequences are morally better if they result from an omission rather than an act

Source

Jonathan Glover (Causing Death and Saving Lives [1977], §7)

Book Ref

Glover,Jonathan: 'Causing Death and Saving Lives' [Penguin 1982], p.92


A Reaction

Is it better if my neglect causes famine in Ethiopia than if my theft causes it? Glover (a consequentialist) rejects this. Depends. What are reasonable expectations? Acts set an example. Minor bad acts are clearly better than callous negligence.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [assessing consequences of failures to act]:

The highest degree of morality performs all that is appropriate, omitting nothing [Chrysippus]
Nations are not obliged to help one-another, but are obliged not to harm one another [Grotius, by Tuck]
There are mere omissions (through ignorance, perhaps), and people can 'commit an omission' [Chisholm]
It is not true that killing and allowing to die (or acts and omissions) are morally indistinguishable [Foot]
Making a runaway tram kill one person instead of five is diverting a fatal sequence, not initiating one [Foot]
Folk morality does not clearly distinguish between doing and allowing [Jackson]
Noninterference requires justification as much as interference does [Nagel]
Acts and Omissions: bad consequences are morally better if they result from an omission rather than an act [Glover]
It doesn't seem worse to switch off a life-support machine than to forget to switch it on [Glover]
Harmful omissions are unavoidable, while most harmful acts can be avoided [Glover]
The act/omission distinction is important for duties, but less so for consequences [LaFollette]
Utilitarians conflate acts and omissions; causing to drown and failing to save are the same [Shorten]