more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 4724

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 3. Internal or External / a. Pro-internalism ]

Full Idea

Internalism about justification says that the reasons one has for a belief must be in some sense available to the knowing subject, ..while externalism holds that it is possible for a person to have a justified belief without having access to the reason.

Gist of Idea

Internalists say the reasons for belief must be available to the subject, and externalists deny this

Source

Paul O'Grady (Relativism [2002], Ch.4)

Book Ref

O'Grady,Paul: 'Relativism' [Acumen 2002], p.102


A Reaction

It strikes me that internalists are talking about the believer being justified, and externalists talk about the belief being justified. I'm with the internalists. If this means cats don't know much, so much the worse for cats.


The 24 ideas from 'Relativism'

There has been a distinct 'Social Turn' in recent philosophy, like the earlier 'Linguistic Turn' [O'Grady]
What counts as a fact partly depends on the availability of human concepts to describe them [O'Grady]
The epistemic theory of truth presents it as 'that which is licensed by our best theory of reality' [O'Grady]
To say a relative truth is inexpressible in other frameworks is 'weak', while saying it is false is 'strong' [O'Grady]
Logical relativism appears if we allow more than one legitimate logical system [O'Grady]
A third value for truth might be "indeterminate", or a point on a scale between 'true' and 'false' [O'Grady]
Wittgenstein reduced Russell's five primitive logical symbols to a mere one [O'Grady]
Early Quine says all beliefs could be otherwise, but later he said we would assume mistranslation [O'Grady]
Anti-realists say our theories (such as wave-particle duality) give reality incompatible properties [O'Grady]
We may say that objects have intrinsic identity conditions, but still allow multiple accounts of them [O'Grady]
Ontological relativists are anti-realists, who deny that our theories carve nature at the joints [O'Grady]
Verificationism was attacked by the deniers of the analytic-synthetic distinction, needed for 'facts' [O'Grady]
If we abandon the analytic-synthetic distinction, scepticism about meaning may be inevitable [O'Grady]
Contextualism says that knowledge is relative to its context; 'empty' depends on your interests [O'Grady]
Sense-data are only safe from scepticism if they are primitive and unconceptualised [O'Grady]
Modern epistemology centres on debates about foundations, and about external justification [O'Grady]
Internalists say the reasons for belief must be available to the subject, and externalists deny this [O'Grady]
Coherence involves support from explanation and evidence, and also probability and confirmation [O'Grady]
Maybe developments in logic and geometry have shown that the a priori may be relative [O'Grady]
The chief problem for fideists is other fideists who hold contrary ideas [O'Grady]
Cryptographers can recognise that something is a language, without translating it [O'Grady]
One may understand a realm of ideas, but be unable to judge their rationality or truth [O'Grady]
Good reasoning will avoid contradiction, enhance coherence, not ignore evidence, and maximise evidence [O'Grady]
Just as maps must simplify their subject matter, so thought has to be reductionist about reality [O'Grady]