more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4732

[filed under theme 14. Science / B. Scientific Theories / 5. Commensurability ]

Full Idea

It is possible to conceive of one understanding the meaning of a realm of ideas, but holding that one cannot judge as to the truth or rationality of the claims made in it.

Gist of Idea

One may understand a realm of ideas, but be unable to judge their rationality or truth

Source

Paul O'Grady (Relativism [2002], Ch.5)

Book Ref

O'Grady,Paul: 'Relativism' [Acumen 2002], p.158


A Reaction

I think Davidson gives good grounds for challenging this, by doubt whether one 'conceptual scheme' can know another without grasping its rationality and truth-conditions.


The 24 ideas from Paul O'Grady

There has been a distinct 'Social Turn' in recent philosophy, like the earlier 'Linguistic Turn' [O'Grady]
What counts as a fact partly depends on the availability of human concepts to describe them [O'Grady]
The epistemic theory of truth presents it as 'that which is licensed by our best theory of reality' [O'Grady]
To say a relative truth is inexpressible in other frameworks is 'weak', while saying it is false is 'strong' [O'Grady]
Logical relativism appears if we allow more than one legitimate logical system [O'Grady]
A third value for truth might be "indeterminate", or a point on a scale between 'true' and 'false' [O'Grady]
Wittgenstein reduced Russell's five primitive logical symbols to a mere one [O'Grady]
Early Quine says all beliefs could be otherwise, but later he said we would assume mistranslation [O'Grady]
Anti-realists say our theories (such as wave-particle duality) give reality incompatible properties [O'Grady]
We may say that objects have intrinsic identity conditions, but still allow multiple accounts of them [O'Grady]
Ontological relativists are anti-realists, who deny that our theories carve nature at the joints [O'Grady]
Verificationism was attacked by the deniers of the analytic-synthetic distinction, needed for 'facts' [O'Grady]
If we abandon the analytic-synthetic distinction, scepticism about meaning may be inevitable [O'Grady]
Contextualism says that knowledge is relative to its context; 'empty' depends on your interests [O'Grady]
Sense-data are only safe from scepticism if they are primitive and unconceptualised [O'Grady]
Modern epistemology centres on debates about foundations, and about external justification [O'Grady]
Internalists say the reasons for belief must be available to the subject, and externalists deny this [O'Grady]
Coherence involves support from explanation and evidence, and also probability and confirmation [O'Grady]
Maybe developments in logic and geometry have shown that the a priori may be relative [O'Grady]
The chief problem for fideists is other fideists who hold contrary ideas [O'Grady]
Cryptographers can recognise that something is a language, without translating it [O'Grady]
One may understand a realm of ideas, but be unable to judge their rationality or truth [O'Grady]
Good reasoning will avoid contradiction, enhance coherence, not ignore evidence, and maximise evidence [O'Grady]
Just as maps must simplify their subject matter, so thought has to be reductionist about reality [O'Grady]