more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4746

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 3. Pragmatism ]

Full Idea

Pragmatism in general is better construed as a certain conception of belief, rather than as a distinctive conception of truth.

Gist of Idea

Pragmatism is better understood as a theory of belief than as a theory of truth

Source

Pascal Engel (Truth [2002], §1.5)

Book Ref

Engel,Pascal: 'Truth' [Acumen 2002], p.35


A Reaction

Which is why aspiring relativists drift towards the pragmatic theory - because they want to dispense with truth (and hence knowledge), and put mere belief in its place.


The 16 ideas from Pascal Engel

In "if and only if" (iff), "if" expresses the sufficient condition, and "only if" the necessary condition [Engel]
Are truth-bearers propositions, or ideas/beliefs, or sentences/utterances? [Engel]
The coherence theory says truth is an internal relationship between groups of truth-bearers [Engel]
We can't explain the corresponding structure of the world except by referring to our thoughts [Engel]
Any coherent set of beliefs can be made more coherent by adding some false beliefs [Engel]
Pragmatism is better understood as a theory of belief than as a theory of truth [Engel]
The redundancy theory gets rid of facts, for 'it is a fact that p' just means 'p' [Engel]
Maybe there is no more to be said about 'true' than there is about the function of 'and' in logic [Engel]
Deflationism must reduce bivalence ('p is true or false') to excluded middle ('p or not-p') [Engel]
Deflationism seems to block philosophers' main occupation, asking metatheoretical questions [Engel]
Deflationism cannot explain why we hold beliefs for reasons [Engel]
Our beliefs are meant to fit the world (i.e. be true), where we want the world to fit our desires [Engel]
Mental states as functions are second-order properties, realised by first-order physical properties [Engel]
The Humean theory of motivation is that beliefs may be motivators as well as desires [Engel]
'Evidentialists' say, and 'voluntarists' deny, that we only believe on the basis of evidence [Engel]
We cannot directly control our beliefs, but we can control the causes of our involuntary beliefs [Engel]