more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4761

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / f. Ethical non-cognitivism ]

Full Idea

Mackie's 'error theory' of ethics says that if a fact is something that corresponds to a true proposition, there are actually no moral facts, hence no knowledge of what moral statements are about.

Gist of Idea

The 'error theory' of morals says there is no moral knowledge, because there are no moral facts

Source

report of J.L. Mackie (Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong [1977]) by Pascal Engel - Truth §4.2

Book Ref

Engel,Pascal: 'Truth' [Acumen 2002], p.107


A Reaction

Personally I am inclined to think that there are moral facts (about what nature shows us constitutes a good human being), based on virtue theory. Mackie is a good warning, though, against making excessive claims. You end up like a bad scientist.


The 12 ideas from J.L. Mackie

Mackie tries to analyse singular causal statements, but his entities are too vague for events [Kim on Mackie]
Necessity and sufficiency are best suited to properties and generic events, not individual events [Kim on Mackie]
A cause is part of a wider set of conditions which suffices for its effect [Mackie, by Crane]
Mackie has a nomological account of general causes, and a subjunctive conditional account of single ones [Mackie, by Tooley]
A cause is an Insufficient but Necessary part of an Unnecessary but Sufficient condition [Mackie]
The virus causes yellow fever, and is 'the' cause; sweets cause tooth decay, but they are not 'the' cause [Mackie]
Necessary conditions are like counterfactuals, and sufficient conditions are like factual conditionals [Mackie]
The INUS account interprets single events, and sequences, causally, without laws being known [Mackie]
Some says mental causation is distinct because we can recognise single occurrences [Mackie]
The 'error theory' of morals says there is no moral knowledge, because there are no moral facts [Mackie, by Engel]
Is evil an illusion, or a necessary contrast, or uncontrollable, or necessary for human free will? [Mackie, by PG]
The propositions that God is good and omnipotent, and that evil exists, are logically contradictory [Mackie, by PG]