more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4839

[filed under theme 10. Modality / B. Possibility / 5. Contingency ]

Full Idea

It is not in the nature of reason to regard things as contingent, but as necessary; ..hence, it is only through our imagination that we consider things, whether in respect to the future or to the past, as contingent.

Gist of Idea

Reason naturally regards things as necessary, and only imagination considers them contingent

Source

Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675], II Pr 44)

Book Ref

Spinoza,Benedict de: 'Ethics, Improvement of Understanding, Letters', ed/tr. Elwes,R [Dover 1955], p.116


A Reaction

A very interesting claim, which seems to be central to rationalism. The empiricist response must be that imagination (which is founded on experience) is a better guide to metaphysical status than pure reason can ever be.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [facts which could be otherwise]:

'Contingent' means that the cause is unperceived, not that there is no cause [Hobbes]
Contingency is an illusion, resulting from our inadequate understanding [Spinoza, by Cottingham]
We only call things 'contingent' in relation to the imperfection of our knowledge [Spinoza]
Reason naturally regards things as necessary, and only imagination considers them contingent [Spinoza]
Necessary truths can be analysed into original truths; contingent truths are infinitely analysable [Leibniz]
A reason must be given why contingent beings should exist rather than not exist [Leibniz]
Contingency arises from tensed verbs changing the propositions to which they refer [Russell]
The necessary/contingent distinction may need to recognise possibilities as real [Armstrong]
'Superficial' contingency: false in some world; 'Deep' contingency: no obvious verification [Evans, by Macià/Garcia-Carpentiro]
Possible non-being which must be realised is 'precariousness'; absolute contingency might never not-be [Meillassoux]