more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4869

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 14. Knowledge of Essences ]

Full Idea

Experience does not teach us any essences of things.

Gist of Idea

Experience does not teach us any essences of things

Source

Baruch de Spinoza (Letters to De Vries [1664], 1664?)

Book Ref

Spinoza,Benedict de: 'Ethics, Improvement of Understanding, Letters', ed/tr. Elwes,R [Dover 1955], p.316


A Reaction

This, along with Leibniz's claim that experience cannot reveal necessities, may constitute a striking criticism of empiricism, but it invites the obvious reply 'so much the worse for essences'. An essence seems to be a theoretical concept, not a priori.


The 19 ideas with the same theme [how we might know the essence of an object]:

Aristotle claims that the individual is epistemologically prior to the universal [Aristotle, by Witt]
Actual knowledge is of the individual, and potential knowledge of the universal [Aristotle, by Witt]
We only know essences through non-essential features, esp. those closest to the essence [Suárez]
Experience does not teach us any essences of things [Spinoza]
The essence of a triangle is simple; presumably substance essences are similar [Locke]
A space between three lines is both the nominal and real essence of a triangle, the source of its properties [Locke]
The schools recognised that they don't really know essences, because they couldn't coin names for them [Locke]
Essence is the distinct thinkability of anything [Leibniz]
Real cognition grasps a thing from within itself, and is not satisfied with mere predicates [Hegel]
If there are essential properties, how do you find out what they are? [Chisholm]
If essences are objects with only essential properties, they are elusive in possible worlds [Marcus (Barcan)]
Kripke claims that some properties, only knowable posteriori, are known a priori to be essential [Kripke, by Soames]
An essence is the necessary properties, derived from an intuitive identity, in origin, type and material [Kripke, by Witt]
The difficulty in essentialism is deciding the grounds for rating an attribute as essential [Cartwright,R]
If we must know some entity to know an essence, we lack a faculty to do that [Lowe]
Knowing an essence is just knowing what the thing is, not knowing some further thing [Lowe]
How can we show that a universally possessed property is an essential property? [Mumford]
Essentialism comes from the cognitive need to categorise [Gelman]
We found no evidence that mothers teach essentialism to their children [Gelman]