more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4956

[filed under theme 19. Language / B. Reference / 3. Direct Reference / c. Social reference ]

Full Idea

In some cases an object may be identified, and the reference of a name fixed, using a description which may turn out to be false of its object.

Gist of Idea

A description may fix a reference even when it is not true of its object

Source

Saul A. Kripke (Naming and Necessity notes and addenda [1972], note 34)

Book Ref

Kripke,Saul: 'Naming and Necessity' [Blackwell 1980], p.80


A Reaction

This is clearly possible. Someone could be identified as 'the criminal' when they were actually innocent. Nevertheless, how do you remember which person was baptised 'Aristotle' if you don't hang on to a description, even a false one?


The 12 ideas with the same theme [reference fixed by persons beyond the speaker]:

For the correct reference of complex ideas, we can only refer to experts [Locke]
A word's meaning is the thing conceived, as fixed by linguistic experts [Reid]
Reference is mainly a social phenomenon [Strawson,P, by Sainsbury]
We need to recognise the contribution of society and of the world in determining reference [Putnam]
Maybe the total mental state of a language community fixes the reference of a term [Putnam]
Neither individual nor community mental states fix reference [Putnam]
Reference (say to 'elms') is a social phenomenon which we can leave to experts [Putnam]
Aristotle implies that we have the complete concepts of a language in our heads, but we don't [Putnam]
Kripke makes reference a largely social matter, external to the mind of the speaker [Kripke, by McGinn]
Kripke's theory is important because it gives a collective account of reference [Kripke, by Putnam]
We refer through the community, going back to the original referent [Kripke]
A description may fix a reference even when it is not true of its object [Kripke]