more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 4997

[filed under theme 18. Thought / D. Concepts / 2. Origin of Concepts / c. Nativist concepts ]

Full Idea

It is widely accepted that for many concepts, if not all, grasping the concept requires grasping some theory, ...which makes difficulties for the view that concepts are not learned: for 'radical concept nativism', as Fodor calls it.

Gist of Idea

It seems unlikely that most concepts are innate, if a theory must be understood to grasp them

Source

Robert Kirk (Mind and Body [2003], §7.3)

Book Ref

Kirk,Robert: 'Mind and Body' [Acumen 2003], p.142


A Reaction

Not a problem for traditional rationalist theories, where the whole theory can be innate along with the concept, but a big objection to modern more cautious non-holistic views (such as Fodor's). Does a bird have a concept AND theory of a nest?


The 15 ideas from 'Mind and Body'

Dualism implies some brain events with no physical cause, and others with no physical effect [Kirk,R]
A weaker kind of reductionism than direct translation is the use of 'bridge laws' [Kirk,R]
All meaningful psychological statements can be translated into physics [Kirk,R]
If mental states are multiply realisable, they could not be translated into physical terms [Kirk,R]
The inverted spectrum idea is often regarded as an objection to behaviourism [Kirk,R]
Behaviourism seems a good theory for intentional states, but bad for phenomenal ones [Kirk,R]
In 'holistic' behaviourism we say a mental state is a complex of many dispositions [Kirk,R]
If a bird captures a worm, we could say its behaviour is 'about' the worm [Kirk,R]
Behaviourism offers a good alternative to simplistic unitary accounts of mental relationships [Kirk,R]
Behaviourists doubt whether reference is a single type of relation [Kirk,R]
Behaviourism says intentionality is an external relation; language of thought says it's internal [Kirk,R]
It seems unlikely that most concepts are innate, if a theory must be understood to grasp them [Kirk,R]
Instead of representation by sentences, it can be by a distribution of connectionist strengths [Kirk,R]
For behaviourists language is just a special kind of behaviour [Kirk,R]
Maybe we should see intentionality and consciousness as a single problem, not two [Kirk,R]