more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5127

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 2. Happiness / b. Eudaimonia ]

Full Idea

We can distinguish at least two possible interpretations of Aristotle's thesis that eudaimonia is the chief good: either eudaimonia is that for the sake of which all action IS undertaken, or that for which all action OUGHT to be undertaken.

Gist of Idea

Does Aristotle say eudaimonia is the aim, or that it ought to be?

Source

comment on Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1097b22) by John McDowell - Role of Eudaimonia in Aristotle's Ethics §1

Book Ref

McDowell,John: 'Mind, Value and Reality' [Harvard 1998], p.3


A Reaction

It seems to me Aristotle is describing how people DO behave (they all want ot flourish), and then goes on to describe how they OUGHT to behave to achieve the end they all want. His theory does not describe convention, which mostly concerns pleasure.


The 15 ideas with the same theme [Greek concept of fulfilment/happiness/flourishing]:

Socrates was the first to put 'eudaimonia' at the centre of ethics [Socrates, by Vlastos]
Happiness is secure enjoyment of what is good and beautiful [Plato]
Eudaimonia is said to only have final value, where reason and virtue are also useful [Aristotle, by Orsi]
Does Aristotle say eudaimonia is the aim, or that it ought to be? [McDowell on Aristotle]
Some good and evil can happen to the dead, just as the living may be unaware of a disaster [Aristotle]
Critolaus redefined Aristotle's moral aim as fulfilment instead of happiness [Critolaus, by White,SA]
Life is like a play - it is the quality that matters, not the length [Seneca]
'Eudaimonia' means 'having a good demon', implying supreme good fortune [Taylor,R]
What counts as 'flourishing' must be relative to various sets of values [Harman]
'Happiness' is a bad translation of 'eudaimonia', which includes both behaving and faring well [MacIntyre]
Philosophers after Aristotle endorsed the medical analogy for eudaimonia [Nussbaum, by Flanagan]
We need Eudaimonics - the empirical study of how we should flourish [Flanagan]
Nowadays we doubt the Greek view that the flourishing of individuals and communities are linked [Zagzebski]
Animals and plants can 'flourish', but only rational beings can have eudaimonia [Hursthouse]
With a broad concept of flourishing, it might be possible without the virtues [Statman]