more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 5322

[filed under theme 16. Persons / C. Self-Awareness / 2. Knowing the Self ]

Full Idea

Self-consciousness is not a primitive datum, or in other words the observer's experiences are not intrinsically marked as his own.

Gist of Idea

Self-consciousness is not basic, because experiences are not instrinsically marked with ownership

Source

A.J. Ayer (The Central Questions of Philosophy [1973], §VI.A)

Book Ref

Ayer,A.J.: 'The Central Questions of Philosophy' [Penguin 1976], p.112


A Reaction

This is a very Humean, ruthlessly empiricist view of the matter. Plenty of philosophers (existentialists, or Charles Taylor) would say that our experiences have our interests or values built into them. Why are they experiences, and not just events?


The 13 ideas from 'The Central Questions of Philosophy'

Self-consciousness is not basic, because experiences are not instrinsically marked with ownership [Ayer]
Qualia must be united by a subject, because they lead to concepts and judgements [Ayer]
Is something an 'experience' because it relates to other experiences, or because it relates to a subject? [Ayer]
Bodily identity and memory work together to establish personal identity [Ayer]
Temporal gaps in the consciousness of a spirit could not be bridged by memories [Ayer]
Why shouldn't we say brain depends on mind? Better explanation! [Ayer]
Originally I combined a mentalistic view of introspection with a behaviouristic view of other minds [Ayer]
Physicalism undercuts the other mind problem, by equating experience with 'public' brain events [Ayer]
You can't infer that because you have a hidden birth-mark, everybody else does [Ayer]
The theory of other minds has no rival [Ayer]
We see properties necessary for a kind (in the definition), but not for an individual [Ayer]
It is currently held that quantifying over something implies belief in its existence [Ayer]
Talk of propositions is just shorthand for talking about equivalent sentences [Ayer]