more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 5329

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 1. Physical Mind ]

Full Idea

If mind and brain exactly correspond we have as good ground for saying the brain depends on the mind as the other way round; if predominance is given to the brain, the reason is that it fits into a wider explanatory system.

Gist of Idea

Why shouldn't we say brain depends on mind? Better explanation!

Source

A.J. Ayer (The Central Questions of Philosophy [1973], §VI.D)

Book Ref

Ayer,A.J.: 'The Central Questions of Philosophy' [Penguin 1976], p.130


A Reaction

A small but significant point. If an 'identity' theory is to be developed, then this step in the argument has to be justified. It is tempting here to move to the eliminativist view, because we no longer have to worry about a 'direction of priority'.


The 13 ideas from 'The Central Questions of Philosophy'

Self-consciousness is not basic, because experiences are not instrinsically marked with ownership [Ayer]
Qualia must be united by a subject, because they lead to concepts and judgements [Ayer]
Is something an 'experience' because it relates to other experiences, or because it relates to a subject? [Ayer]
Bodily identity and memory work together to establish personal identity [Ayer]
Temporal gaps in the consciousness of a spirit could not be bridged by memories [Ayer]
Why shouldn't we say brain depends on mind? Better explanation! [Ayer]
Originally I combined a mentalistic view of introspection with a behaviouristic view of other minds [Ayer]
Physicalism undercuts the other mind problem, by equating experience with 'public' brain events [Ayer]
You can't infer that because you have a hidden birth-mark, everybody else does [Ayer]
The theory of other minds has no rival [Ayer]
We see properties necessary for a kind (in the definition), but not for an individual [Ayer]
It is currently held that quantifying over something implies belief in its existence [Ayer]
Talk of propositions is just shorthand for talking about equivalent sentences [Ayer]