more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5349

[filed under theme 16. Persons / E. Rejecting the Self / 4. Denial of the Self ]

Full Idea

According to Buddhism, the idea of a permanent, constant self is an illusion, and a morally dangerous one.

Gist of Idea

For Buddhists a fixed self is a morally dangerous illusion

Source

Owen Flanagan (The Problem of the Soul [2002], p.161)

Book Ref

Flanagan,Owen: 'The Problem of the Soul' [Basic Books 2003], p.161


A Reaction

We are familiar with the idea that it might be an illusion, but I am unconvinced by 'morally dangerous'. If you drop both free will and personal identity, I can't see any sort of focus for moral life left, but I am willing to be convinced.


The 30 ideas from Owen Flanagan

People believe they have free will that circumvents natural law, but only an incorporeal mind could do this [Flanagan]
Philosophy needs wisdom about who we are, as well as how we ought to be [Flanagan]
We resist science partly because it can't provide ethical wisdom [Flanagan]
Emotions are usually very apt, rather than being non-rational and fickle [Flanagan]
Ethics is the science of the conditions that lead to human flourishing [Flanagan]
Normal free will claims control of what I do, but a stronger view claims control of thought and feeling [Flanagan]
Cars and bodies obey principles of causation, without us knowing any 'strict laws' about them [Flanagan]
Explanation does not entail prediction [Flanagan]
Only you can have your subjective experiences because only you are hooked up to your nervous system [Flanagan]
Physicalism doesn't deny that the essence of an experience is more than its neural realiser [Flanagan]
People largely came to believe in dualism because it made human agents free [Flanagan]
Free will is held to give us a whole list of desirable capacities for living [Flanagan]
We only think of ourselves as having free will because we first thought of God that way [Flanagan]
In the 17th century a collisionlike view of causation made mental causation implausible [Flanagan]
Behaviourism notoriously has nothing to say about mental causation [Flanagan]
Intellectualism admires the 'principled actor', non-intellectualism admires the 'good character' [Flanagan]
For Buddhists a fixed self is a morally dangerous illusion [Flanagan]
The Hindu doctrine of reincarnation only appeared in the eighth century CE [Flanagan]
We only have a sense of our self as continuous, not as exactly the same [Flanagan]
The idea of the soul gets some support from the scientific belief in essential 'natural kinds' [Flanagan]
The self is an abstraction which magnifies important aspects of autobiography [Flanagan]
We are not born with a self; we develop a self through living [Flanagan]
Cognitivists think morals are discovered by reason [Flanagan]
For Darwinians, altruism is either contracts or genetics [Flanagan]
Alienation is not finding what one wants, or being unable to achieve it [Flanagan]
Buddhists reject God and the self, and accept suffering as key, and liberation through wisdom [Flanagan]
Sensations may be identical to brain events, but complex mental events don't seem to be [Flanagan]
Research suggest that we overrate conscious experience [Flanagan]
Morality is normative because it identifies best practices among the normal practices [Flanagan]
We need Eudaimonics - the empirical study of how we should flourish [Flanagan]