more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5424

[filed under theme 3. Truth / D. Coherence Truth / 2. Coherence Truth Critique ]

Full Idea

Coherence cannot be accepted as the meaning of truth, though it is often a most important test of truth after a certain amount of truth has become known.

Gist of Idea

Coherence is not the meaning of truth, but an important test for truth

Source

Bertrand Russell (Problems of Philosophy [1912], Ch.12)

Book Ref

Russell,Bertrand: 'The Problems of Philosophy' [OUP 1995], p.71


A Reaction

The coherence theory is in fact a confusion of epistemology and ontology. Compare Idea 1364, where Reid charges Locke with confusing the test for personal identity with the thing itself. I wonder if refusal to accept essences causes this problem?

Related Ideas

Idea 1364 Locke confuses the test for personal identity with the thing itself [Reid on Locke]

Idea 21326 Locke's memory theory of identity confuses personal identity with the test for it [Reid on Locke]


The 8 ideas with the same theme [criticism of the coherence theory of truth]:

If we suspend the law of contradiction, nothing will appear to be incoherent [Russell]
Coherence is not the meaning of truth, but an important test for truth [Russell]
More than one coherent body of beliefs seems possible [Russell]
Even with a tight account of coherence, there is always the possibility of more than one set of coherent propositions [Dancy,J]
The coherence theory of truth implies idealism, because facts are just coherent beliefs [McGinn]
Any coherent set of beliefs can be made more coherent by adding some false beliefs [Engel]
The coherence theory allows multiple coherent wholes, which could contradict one another [Horsten]
How do you identify the best coherence set; and aren't there truths which don't cohere? [Young,JO]