more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5438

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / H. Continental Philosophy / 3. Hermeneutics ]

Full Idea

Ricoeur distinguishes a hermeneutics of tradition (e.g. Gadamar), which interprets sympathetically looking for hidden messages, and a hermeneutics of suspicion (e.g. Nietzsche, Freud) which sees hidden drives and interests.

Gist of Idea

Hermeneutics of tradition is sympathetic, hermeneutics of suspicion is hostile

Source

report of Paul Ricoeur (works [1970]) by Thomas Mautner - Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy p.249

Book Ref

Mautner,Thomas: 'Dictionary of Philosophy' [Penguin 1997], p.249


A Reaction

Obviously the answer is somewhere between the two. Nietzsche's suspicion can be wonderful, but Freud's can seem silly (e.g. on Leonardo). On the whole I am on the 'tradition' side, because great thinkers can rise above their culture (on a good day).


The 15 ideas with the same theme [seeking rhetorical explanation instead of hard facts]:

An interpreter of a text, because of wider knowledge, can understand it better than its author [Schleiermacher, by Mautner]
Unity emerges from understanding particulars, so understanding is prior to seeing unity [Schleiermacher]
The claim of hermeneutics to give knowledge through understanding is challenged by positivism [Mautner on Dilthey]
Thoughts are uncertain, and are just occasions for interpretation [Nietzsche]
A text has many interpretations, but no 'correct' one [Nietzsche]
A text explained ceases to be a text [Cioran]
Interpretations can be interpreted, so there is no original 'meaning' available [Derrida]
Hermeneutics of tradition is sympathetic, hermeneutics of suspicion is hostile [Ricoeur, by Mautner]
Hermeneutics blunts truth, by conforming it to the interpreter [Derrida, by Zimmermann,J]
Hermeneutics is hostile, trying to overcome the other person's difference [Derrida, by Zimmermann,J]
The 'hermeneutic circle' says parts and wholes are interdependent, and so cannot be interpreted [Mautner]
Knowledge is not a static set of correct propositions, but a continuing search for better interpretations [Polt]
Interpreting a text is representing it as making sense [Morris,M]
The hermeneutic circle is either within the text, or between text and biased reader [Norden]
Heremeneutics is either 'faith' (examining truth) or 'suspicion' (looking for hidden motives) [Norden]