more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5538

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 5. Empiricism Critique ]

Full Idea

The understanding is not capable of intuiting anything, and the senses are not capable of thinking anything. Only from their unification can cognition arise.

Gist of Idea

Understanding has no intuitions, and senses no thought, so knowledge needs their unity

Source

Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason [1781], B075/A51)

Book Ref

Kant,Immanuel: 'Critique of Pure Reason', ed/tr. Guyer,P /Wood,A W [CUO 1998], p.194


A Reaction

At first glance this seems to settle the rationalist-empiricist debate at a stroke, by rejecting the rationalist dream of knowledge arising from pure intuitions, and the empiricist dream of knowledge from pure sensation. It can't be that simple, though…


The 38 ideas with the same theme [rejection of knowledge arising just from experience]:

The senses are too feeble to determine the truth [Anaxagoras]
Aristotle's concepts of understanding and explanation mean he is not a pure empiricist [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
Animals may have some knowledge if they retain perception, but understanding requires reasons to be given [Aristotle]
Knowledge may be based on senses, but we needn't sense all our knowledge [Aquinas]
If someone had only seen the basic colours, they could deduce the others from resemblance [Descartes]
Senses cannot judge one another, so what judges senses cannot be a sense, but must be superior [Cudworth]
It is unclear how identity, equality, perfection, God, power and cause derive from experience [Locke, by Dancy,J]
Knowledge doesn't just come from the senses; we know the self, substance, identity, being etc. [Leibniz]
Our sensation of green is a confused idea, like objects blurred by movement [Leibniz]
Hume mistakenly lumps sensations and perceptions together as 'impressions' [Scruton on Hume]
If a person had a gap in their experience of blue shades, they could imaginatively fill it in [Hume]
Even Hume didn't include mathematics in his empiricism [Hume, by Kant]
Understanding has no intuitions, and senses no thought, so knowledge needs their unity [Kant]
Sensations are a posteriori, but that they come in degrees is known a priori [Kant]
Many people imagine that to experience is to understand [Goethe]
Empiricists are passive thinkers, given their philosophy by the external world and fate [Novalis]
Empiricism unknowingly contains and uses a metaphysic, which underlies its categories [Hegel]
Empiricism of the finite denies the supersensible, and can only think with formal abstraction [Hegel]
The Humean view stops us thinking about perception, and finding universals and necessities in it [Hegel]
The world is one of experience, but experiences are always located among our ideas [Peirce]
We can have two opposite sensations, like hard and soft, at the same time [Nietzsche]
It is hard to explain how a sentence like 'it is not raining' can be found true by observation [Russell]
Perception can't prove universal generalisations, so abandon them, or abandon empiricism? [Russell]
Full empiricism is not tenable, but empirical investigation is always essential [Russell]
Empiricists seem unclear what they mean by 'experience' [Russell]
I can know the existence of something with which nobody is acquainted [Russell]
Empiricism, it is said, cannot account for our knowledge of necessary truths [Ayer]
The second dogma is linking every statement to some determinate observations [Quine, by Yablo]
Empirical and a priori knowledge are not distinct, but are extremes of a sliding scale [Dummett]
Davidson says the world influences us causally; I say it influences us rationally [McDowell on Davidson]
Without the dualism of scheme and content, not much is left of empiricism [Davidson]
Experience cannot teach us why maths and logic are necessary [Katz]
To find empiricism and science in the same culture is surprising, as they are really incompatible [MacIntyre]
Most of our knowledge has insufficient sensory support [Sosa]
Rationalists say there is more to a concept than the experience that prompts it [Fodor]
Necessity and possibility are big threats to the empiricist view of knowledge [McGinn]
Extreme empiricists can hardly explain anything [Swoyer]
The doctrine of empiricism does not itself seem to be empirically justified [Ladyman/Ross]