more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5618

[filed under theme 2. Reason / D. Definition / 2. Aims of Definition ]

Full Idea

To define properly means just to exhibit originally the exhaustive concept of a thing within its boundaries

Gist of Idea

Definitions exhibit the exhaustive concept of a thing within its boundaries

Source

Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason [1781], B755/A727)

Book Ref

Kant,Immanuel: 'Critique of Pure Reason', ed/tr. Guyer,P /Wood,A W [CUO 1998], p.637


A Reaction

There is nothing in the concept of a 'definition' that requires it to be exhaustive, because some things are too vague. Define the 'south' of England. What are the 'boundaries', if the concept could shift in its extension?


The 19 ideas with the same theme [what a definition is trying to achieve]:

To reveal a nature, divide down, and strip away what it has in common with other things [Plato]
No one wants to define 'weaving' just for the sake of weaving [Plato]
Definitions of things that are caused must express their manner of generation [Hobbes]
All the intrinsic properties of a thing should be deducible from its definition [Spinoza]
Definitions exhibit the exhaustive concept of a thing within its boundaries [Kant]
A simplification which is complete constitutes a definition [Kant]
Later Frege held that definitions must fix a function's value for every possible argument [Frege, by Wright,C]
A definition need not capture the sense of an expression - just get the reference right [Frege, by Dummett]
A correct definition is what can be substituted without loss of meaning [Ducasse]
Some definitions aim to fix a reference rather than give a meaning [Kripke]
Defining terms either enables elimination, or shows that they don't require elimination [Lewis]
A definition needs to apply to the same object across possible worlds [Gupta]
The 'revision theory' says that definitions are rules for improving output [Gupta]
Definitions make our intuitions mathematically useful [Mayberry]
Precision is only one of the virtues of a good definition [Zagzebski]
Definitions concern how we should speak, not how things are [Fine,K]
Definitions should be replaceable by primitives, and should not be creative [Brown,JR]
A definition should allow the defined term to be eliminated [Horsten]
An explicit definition enables the elimination of what is defined [Halbach]