more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5639

[filed under theme 9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 2. Substance / b. Need for substance ]

Full Idea

Without the notion of substance, according to Spinoza, thought itself becomes impossible.

Gist of Idea

Spinoza implies that thought is impossible without the notion of substance

Source

report of Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675]) by Roger Scruton - Short History of Modern Philosophy §5.2

Book Ref

Scruton,Roger: 'A Short History of Modern Philosophy' [ARK 1985], p.52


A Reaction

Spinoza's strategy here looks like the right way to approach metaphysics. To what extent is it possible to change our conceptual scheme? Quine seems to imply that there is no limit; Davidson seems to imply that it is impossible.


The 6 ideas with the same theme [why we need the concept of substance]:

We may have to postulate unobservable and unknowable substances [Aristotle]
By comparing qualities and features, reason can gradually infer the nature of substance [Grosseteste]
Spinoza implies that thought is impossible without the notion of substance [Spinoza, by Scruton]
Aggregates don’t reduce to points, or atoms, or illusion, so must reduce to substance [Leibniz]
We accept substance, to avoid infinite backwards chains of meaning [Wittgenstein, by Potter]
If dependence is well-founded, with no infinite backward chains, this implies substances [Potter]