more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5683

[filed under theme 11. Knowledge Aims / C. Knowing Reality / 1. Perceptual Realism / c. Representative realism ]

Full Idea

The four standard reasons for preferring indirect to direct realism are introspection of our mental processes, the time-lag argument, the argument from illusion, and the findings of neuroscience.

Clarification

The time-lag is the time taken for light etc. to reach our senses

Gist of Idea

Indirect realism depends on introspection, the time-lag, illusions, and neuroscience

Source

report of Jonathan Dancy (Intro to Contemporary Epistemology [1985], 10.4) by PG - Db (ideas)

Book Ref

Dancy,Jonathan: 'Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology' [Blackwell 1985], p.152


A Reaction

Ultimately one's views about realism depend on one's views of the mind/brain, and it is the last of the four reasons that sways me. We know enough about the complexity of the brain to accept that it represents reality, with no additional ontology.


The 9 ideas with the same theme [we know reality via mental representations]:

Whether honey is essentially sweet may be doubted, as it is a matter of judgement rather than appearance [Sext.Empiricus]
Hume says objects are not a construction, but an imaginative leap [Hume, by Robinson,H]
Science condemns sense-data and accepts matter, but a logical construction must link them [Russell]
Russell (1912) said phenomena only resemble reality in abstract structure [Russell, by Robinson,H]
There is no reason to think that objects have colours [Russell]
Internal realism holds that we perceive physical objects via mental objects [Dancy,J]
Indirect realism depends on introspection, the time-lag, illusions, and neuroscience [Dancy,J, by PG]
Representative realists believe that laws of phenomena will apply to the physical world [Robinson,H]
Representative realists believe some properties of sense-data are shared by the objects themselves [Robinson,H]