more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5744

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / D. Modal Logic ML / 1. Modal Logic ]

Full Idea

First-order predicate calculus is an extensional logic, while quantified modal logic is intensional (which has grave problems of interpretation, according to Quine).

Clarification

'Extensions' concern items in the world; 'intensions' concern internal meaning

Gist of Idea

First-order predicate calculus is extensional logic, but quantified modal logic is intensional (hence dubious)

Source

Joseph Melia (Modality [2003], Ch.3)

Book Ref

Melia,Joseph: 'Modality' [Acumen 2003], p.63


A Reaction

The battle is over ontology. Quine wants the ontology to stick with the values of the variables (i.e. the items in the real world that are quantified over in the extension). The rival view arises from attempts to explain necessity and counterfactuals.


The 17 ideas from Joseph Melia

'De re' modality is about things themselves, 'de dicto' modality is about propositions [Melia]
Possible worlds make it possible to define necessity and counterfactuals without new primitives [Melia]
In possible worlds semantics the modal operators are treated as quantifiers [Melia]
If possible worlds semantics is not realist about possible worlds, logic becomes merely formal [Melia]
Sometimes we want to specify in what ways a thing is possible [Melia]
No sort of plain language or levels of logic can express modal facts properly [Melia]
Maybe names and predicates can capture any fact [Melia]
We may be sure that P is necessary, but is it necessarily necessary? [Melia]
Predicate logic has connectives, quantifiers, variables, predicates, equality, names and brackets [Melia]
Second-order logic needs second-order variables and quantification into predicate position [Melia]
If every model that makes premises true also makes conclusion true, the argument is valid [Melia]
First-order predicate calculus is extensional logic, but quantified modal logic is intensional (hence dubious) [Melia]
The Identity of Indiscernibles is contentious for qualities, and trivial for non-qualities [Melia]
We accept unverifiable propositions because of simplicity, utility, explanation and plausibility [Melia]
Consistency is modal, saying propositions are consistent if they could be true together [Melia]
Possible worlds could be real as mathematics, propositions, properties, or like books [Melia]
The truth of propositions at possible worlds are implied by the world, just as in books [Melia]