more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5746

[filed under theme 9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 7. Indiscernible Objects ]

Full Idea

If the Identity of Indiscernibles is referring to qualitative properties, such as 'being red' or 'having mass', it is contentious; if it is referring to non-qualitative properties, such as 'member of set s' or 'brother of a', it is true but trivial.

Gist of Idea

The Identity of Indiscernibles is contentious for qualities, and trivial for non-qualities

Source

Joseph Melia (Modality [2003], Ch.3 n 11)

Book Ref

Melia,Joseph: 'Modality' [Acumen 2003], p.177


A Reaction

I would say 'false' rather than 'contentious'. No one has ever offered a way of distinguishing two electrons, but that doesn't mean there is just one (very busy) electron. The problem is that 'indiscernible' is only an epistemological concept.


The 17 ideas from Joseph Melia

'De re' modality is about things themselves, 'de dicto' modality is about propositions [Melia]
Possible worlds make it possible to define necessity and counterfactuals without new primitives [Melia]
In possible worlds semantics the modal operators are treated as quantifiers [Melia]
If possible worlds semantics is not realist about possible worlds, logic becomes merely formal [Melia]
We may be sure that P is necessary, but is it necessarily necessary? [Melia]
Predicate logic has connectives, quantifiers, variables, predicates, equality, names and brackets [Melia]
Second-order logic needs second-order variables and quantification into predicate position [Melia]
If every model that makes premises true also makes conclusion true, the argument is valid [Melia]
Maybe names and predicates can capture any fact [Melia]
Sometimes we want to specify in what ways a thing is possible [Melia]
No sort of plain language or levels of logic can express modal facts properly [Melia]
First-order predicate calculus is extensional logic, but quantified modal logic is intensional (hence dubious) [Melia]
The Identity of Indiscernibles is contentious for qualities, and trivial for non-qualities [Melia]
We accept unverifiable propositions because of simplicity, utility, explanation and plausibility [Melia]
Consistency is modal, saying propositions are consistent if they could be true together [Melia]
Possible worlds could be real as mathematics, propositions, properties, or like books [Melia]
The truth of propositions at possible worlds are implied by the world, just as in books [Melia]