more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 5795

[filed under theme 15. Nature of Minds / B. Features of Minds / 1. Consciousness / a. Consciousness ]

Full Idea

There are not two kinds of consciousness, an information-processing consciousness that is amenable to scientific investigation and a phenomenal, what-it-subjectively-feels-like form of consciousness that will forever remain mysterious.

Gist of Idea

There isn't one consciousness (information-processing) which can be investigated, and another (phenomenal) which can't

Source

John Searle (The Mystery of Consciousness [1997], Concl.1)

Book Ref

Searle,John R.: 'The Mystery of Consciousness' [Granta 1997], p.200


A Reaction

Fodor appears to be the main target of this remark. The view that we can explain intentionality but not qualia is currently very fashionable. I am sympathetic to Searle here. Consciousness isn't an epiphenomenon, it is essential to all thought.


The 13 ideas from 'The Mystery of Consciousness'

A property is 'emergent' if it is caused by elements of a system, when the elements lack the property [Searle]
A system is either conscious or it isn't, though the intensity varies a lot [Searle]
The use of 'qualia' seems to imply that consciousness and qualia are separate [Searle]
I now think syntax is not in the physics, but in the eye of the beholder [Searle]
There is non-event causation between mind and brain, as between a table and its solidity [Searle]
Explanation of how we unify our mental stimuli into a single experience is the 'binding problem' [Searle]
Reduction is either by elimination, or by explanation [Searle]
Consciousness has a first-person ontology, which only exists from a subjective viewpoint [Searle]
Eliminative reduction needs a gap between appearance and reality, as in sunsets [Searle]
Consciousness has a first-person ontology, so it cannot be reduced without omitting something [Searle]
If tree rings contain information about age, then age contains information about rings [Searle]
The pattern of molecules in the sea is much more complex than the complexity of brain neurons [Searle]
There isn't one consciousness (information-processing) which can be investigated, and another (phenomenal) which can't [Searle]