more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 5818

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / b. Scientific necessity ]

Full Idea

Once we have discovered that water (in the actual world) is H2O, nothing counts as a possible world in which water isn't H2O.

Gist of Idea

If water is H2O in the actual world, there is no possible world where it isn't H2O

Source

Hilary Putnam (Meaning and Reference [1973], p.159)

Book Ref

'Meaning and Reference', ed/tr. Moore,A.W. [OUP 1993], p.159


A Reaction

Presumably there could be a possible world in which water is a bit cloudy, so the fact that it is H2O is being judged as essential. Presumably the scientists in the possible world might discover that we are wrong about the chemistry of water?


The 7 ideas from 'Meaning and Reference'

I can't distinguish elm trees, but I mean by 'elm' the same set of trees as everybody else [Putnam]
Language is more like a cooperative steamship than an individual hammer [Putnam]
If water is H2O in the actual world, there is no possible world where it isn't H2O [Putnam]
Conceivability is no proof of possibility [Putnam]
A statement can be metaphysically necessary and epistemologically contingent [Putnam]
'Water' has an unnoticed indexical component, referring to stuff around here [Putnam]
We need to recognise the contribution of society and of the world in determining reference [Putnam]